Shell advisor quits, accusing firm of ‘extreme harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety consultant has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of causing “extreme harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change risks” and urged others within the oil and gasoline business to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The manager, who works for the impartial company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had give up due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gasoline firm of “working beyond the design limits of our planetary programs” and “not placing environmental security before manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s said security ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Goal Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable but they are completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to the environment and to individuals. And whatever they are saying, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m ready to deal with the results.”

Shell was a “major consumer” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gas production. She began working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the risks of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “Because, contrary to Shell’s public expressions around net zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and fuel, however planning to explore and extract way more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was inspired to stop working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Insurrection local weather protesters urging the company’s workers to leave. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing mission encourages oil and gas workers to walk away from the trade.

The advisor, who runs inside security surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many individuals working in fossil gas companies just aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves if they actually believe their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clear energy sector left amid reports they have been pissed off on the tempo of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions will likely be mentioned on the assembly where the Dutch activist group Follow This may push for the company’s insurance policies to be more in step with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has told buyers to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set extra stringent local weather goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief executive, Ben van Beurden, may experience an investor riot in opposition to his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Sign up to the every day Enterprise Right now e-mail or follow Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson mentioned: “Be in little doubt, we are decided to deliver on our international strategy to be a internet zero company by 2050 and thousands of our persons are working hard to realize this. We have set targets for the brief, medium and long run, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, although the world will nonetheless need oil and gasoline for decades to come in sectors that can’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family payments after the energy business reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition events to name on the federal government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and gas producer in the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it will result in the trade approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Power’s chief govt, Linda Cook, told the Monetary Times: “A higher tax burden will make it more difficult for brand new oil and fuel initiatives to fulfill funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer tasks shall be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when industry is being encouraged to extend home UK oil and fuel production and assist an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has informed the federal government it plans to invest $6bn in the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook had received a £4.6m “golden good day” from the firm.