Shell guide quits, accusing agency of ‘extreme harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety guide has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the setting.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others within the oil and fuel industry to “walk away whereas there’s still time”.

The chief, who works for the impartial company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she mentioned she had give up due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas firm of “working past the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not putting environmental security earlier than production”.

She stated: “Shell’s acknowledged safety ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they are completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to the environment and to folks. And no matter they say, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett informed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m ready to deal with the implications.”

Shell was a “main consumer” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and fuel manufacturing. She began working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for an organization that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she said. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around net zero, they aren't winding down on oil and gasoline, but planning to explore and extract rather more.”

Dennett – a legal justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was impressed to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Revolt climate protesters urging the corporate’s staff to go away. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing project encourages oil and fuel employees to walk away from the trade.

The advisor, who runs internal security surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many people working in fossil fuel companies simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really imagine their vision for extra oil and gas extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clear power sector left amid stories they have been annoyed on the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to reduce emissions will probably be mentioned at the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Follow It will push for the company’s policies to be more in keeping with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has instructed traders to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set more stringent climate goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, may expertise an investor rebellion in opposition to his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign as much as the daily Enterprise Immediately e-mail or observe Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in no doubt, we're determined to deliver on our global strategy to be a internet zero company by 2050 and hundreds of our individuals are working exhausting to achieve this. We have now set targets for the brief, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, though the world will nonetheless want oil and fuel for decades to come back in sectors that can’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the energy trade reported bumper earnings fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition parties to call on the federal government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and gasoline producer within the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it will result in the industry approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Vitality’s chief executive, Linda Cook, instructed the Financial Occasions: “A better tax burden will make it more challenging for brand spanking new oil and gas initiatives to satisfy investment hurdle rates, which means fewer initiatives can be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being inspired to increase domestic UK oil and fuel production and assist an orderly vitality transition.”

Harbour has advised the government it plans to invest $6bn within the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook had obtained a £4.6m “golden whats up” from the agency.