Shell consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘extreme harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety guide has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gasoline producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “extreme harms” to the setting.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others in the oil and gasoline trade to “stroll away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The chief, who works for the independent agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had stop due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “working beyond the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not placing environmental safety before manufacturing”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s acknowledged safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they're completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to our environment and to people. And whatever they are saying, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett advised the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the implications.”

Shell was a “major shopper” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and gas manufacturing. She began working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can no longer work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “Because, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around internet zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and gas, however planning to explore and extract much more.”

Dennett – a prison justice graduate who has spent her profession in research and consultancy – was impressed to cease working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Rise up climate protesters urging the company’s employees to depart. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing challenge encourages oil and gasoline workers to walk away from the business.

The consultant, who runs internal security surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gas firms simply aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually imagine their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clear vitality sector left amid experiences they were annoyed on the tempo of Shell’s shift in the direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions might be discussed on the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Follow This will push for the company’s policies to be extra in keeping with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has told traders to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set more stringent local weather objectives.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor rebel towards his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Signal up to the daily Enterprise At the moment e mail or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in no doubt, we are determined to deliver on our global strategy to be a web zero company by 2050 and thousands of our individuals are working hard to realize this. We now have set targets for the quick, medium and long run, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, though the world will still need oil and gas for decades to return in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the energy business reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition parties to name on the federal government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and gas producer within the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it will lead to the trade approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Energy’s chief govt, Linda Prepare dinner, told the Financial Times: “The next tax burden will make it tougher for brand spanking new oil and gas initiatives to satisfy funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer projects shall be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being encouraged to extend domestic UK oil and gas manufacturing and support an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has told the government it plans to speculate $6bn in the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook had obtained a £4.6m “golden whats up” from the agency.